Technologies and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures across Europe, new technologies are actually reviving these kinds of systems. Coming from lie recognition tools analyzed at the boundary to a system for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being used in asylum applications. This article explores just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. That reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series www.ascella-llc.com/asylum-procedure-advice of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with capricious tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their very own capacity to find their way these devices and to go after their right for safeguards.

It also demonstrates how these kinds of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from accessing the stations of safety. It further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of the technologies, through which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects so, who are regimented by their reliance on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article argues that these technology have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double result: while they help to expedite the asylum procedure, they also generate it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They can be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to bogus decisions made by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *